The U.S. has struck a deal to take majority control of more than 65 billion barrels of Venezuela’s oil reserves, nine months after the U.S. military abducted President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores in a raid on Caracas and two months after The New York Times revealed that U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has become the de facto viceroy of Venezuela, effectively controlling Venezuela’s finances, the distribution of its natural resources and its government. The new oil deal gives the Department of Defense a 35% stake in a joint U.S.-Venezuelan private company that now holds 100-year leases to 17 oil fields. It also gives the U.S. the right to buy some of the oil produced at cost — a major triumph for the Trump administration as the war on Iran depletes the United States’ strategic oil reserves. Venezuela’s acting President Delcy Rodríguez claims U.S. investment in Venezuela’s oil industry will jumpstart the country’s floundering economy, but critics, including Venezuelan economist Francisco Rodríguez, say the deal is not only “unfavorable to Venezuela” but also appears to violate the Venezuelan Constitution.

  • lmdnw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    A contract made under duress, like having a gun to your head, is not a valid contract. The dumb, rapist, Donald Trump, should know that seeing how many contracts he’s violated in his lifetime. These leases are not legal and will not be valid after this administration is gone.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I highly doubt the DNC would disqualify the contracts. These contracts will not outlive the fall of the US Empire itself though.

      • lmdnw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’d say that Venezuela would be able to disqualify the contracts and they would be on stable legal footing. The question is whether the American people will stop being evil imperialists and support Venezuela’s right to do so, or whether there would be another jingoistic movement to seize “their” oil.

        • KeavesSharpi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Serious question for you: how exactly do you see the American people doing anything about this beyond trying to vote out the fascists? The decades of protests since Iraq accomplished nothing, whether it was the Iraq war, Occupy, BLM or ICE.

          • lmdnw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Do you think a Democrat run administration would attack Venezuela if it unilaterally decided that the lease agreements it made under threat were not valid? I’m arguing from the POV of the Venezuelans and think they can, should, and will rescind this agreement once Trump is finally gone.

            • bedwyr@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              On repudiation of the contracts the companies would take them to court, secure a large judgement, then get the court to seize assets for them. The democrats wouldn’t stop it.

            • zedcell@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Official “enemy states” like Venezuela are enemy States for both parties, and their populations are considered less than human for the sake of foreign intervention and adventurism by the entire US political establishment.

              Want proof? Look at how nominally left and liberal allies to the US in government treated and treat the US’ behaviour in Venezuela. They don’t give a fuck.

        • bedwyr@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Legal footing means nothing. Might makes right as of now.

          No legal footing has less of foothold than international law either.

          If (when,) they repudiate the contracts, US courts will freeze assets outside of the US for the complainants, if not arrest and charge people they kidnap unlawfully or not from other countries.

  • bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The oil majors didn’t even want these, the administration forced them into it. They are worried about governmental and societal certainty, which is very in the air there.

    • pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure big oil wants more oil. If govenment stops letting them take the oil they will just coup them again. Why does big oil not want this?

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They do, but they do risk analysis. Money put in, to money earned, and in a country like this, with the way this deal was made, they don’t believe the odds of the agreement standing for long enough to make them bank is good.

        • pineapple@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The coups don’t cost them any money, it’s the tax payers that pay for that.

            • pineapple@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              They don’t have to extract the oil if they don’t want to, but clearly it’s profitable for them because they are extracting oil.

              • bedwyr@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                They think they will lose on bet, but they are joining because the gangsterr king, that is the proez of usa, can’t make this shit up

    • KeavesSharpi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I mean “oil grab” is a pretty non-consentual thing. Fits the bill for me. They literally took over the country, put their guy in, then grabbed the oil. Basically Iraq all over again but with no declaration of war and a lot less bombs.