• Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Well do the work and call it for what it is, not just “AI”.

    Generative AI.

    LLM

    Is it truly that hard?

    I mean you seem to want to, and thus we can have a discussion about it, which I favour instead of having people just being generally angry it seems.

    The day when it doesn’t crush the environment, should we use gen AI to help us in our daily lives? Or should we not? Is there something good in it? Or isn’t it? I’d love seing constructive discussions but they just get globbed by people thinking with their gut it seems. Like if you don’t hate “AI” then you’re pro genocide.

    Sorry for the rant!

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The day when it doesn’t crush the environment

      Why should we indulge your hypothetical? They’re actively building fossil fuel powered data centers so it’s not even moving in that direction.

      And most tech literate people that are anti-genAI would also prefer if it didn’t completely usurp the term AI or that everything historically called ML got also got sucked in. You’re acting like anti people made that happen but it was the boosters and now AI=chatgpt is in the common lexicon. Nitpicking their language when you obviously know damn well what they mean is just silly.