• exu@feditown.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    They don’t want to, which is fine for their goal of having the absolutely most secure phone possible.

    • Jiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That is mincing words but as long as they don’t change their requirements (which they don’t want to) they actually can’t, without failing those requirements.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Short-sighted goal in my opinion. They could be the leader in privacy for smartphones from the bottom up, including hardware and software.

      GOS’s work with Motorola might just lead Motorola to be that group as they always have for decades, so my issues might go away anyways.

      Just getting arrogant, self-isolating vibes when they have soooo much good will with the tech community on building privacy from the ground up in some of the most important intelligent devices in our lives.

      Why can’t GOS join a working group with ISO or IEC or IEEE or other groups to create roadmaps and tiers of compliance so that other manufacturers have means and methods of approaching GOS’s lofty goals.