World's largest open library calls for volunteers to scan and preserve physical books as AI companies buy, scan, and destroy them — Anna's Archive says ‘time is running out’ as ‘knowledge is permanently monopolized on private servers’
www.tomshardware.com
As AI tech companies increasingly buy and destroy books to feed to their AI models, Anna's Archive is calling for volunteers to help preserve them for the public record.

cross-posted from: https://kbin.earth/m/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com/t/3120649

As AI tech companies increasingly buy and destroy books to feed to their AI models, Anna’s Archive is calling for volunteers to help preserve them for the public record.

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    11·
    1 day ago

    I don’t think that’s the argument you think it is.

    The outrage is over the books being destructively scanned, en mass, and held in private after the fact. Very, very, very different than the majority of scanning which is non destructive, and usually shared.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      1 day ago

      ‘En mass’

      No. That’s not what that means.

      They destroyed (a) copy they bought. That is not en mass.

      you didn’t buy it. It’s their copy.

      They didn’t destroy all copies. Go buy yourself one of you wanted it so bad. You can support the author too.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        1·
        24 hours ago

        If they buy 100k books and destroy them all, even if every one is unique, that is en mass. I don’t know why I have to explain that to you, but there you go.

        • Smoogs@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          19 hours ago

          They bought each one as a copy. They aren’t taking all copies of all books.

          Not sure why I have to explain basic math to you but here we are. Learn math bro.

          And get if they are recycling THEIR ONE COPY OF EACH which they no longer use that isn’t illegal nor worth an outrage. That’s how recycling and reducing waste works. Better than hoarding.

          Do feel free to go buy a copy and support the author if you’re this passionate to get enraged over what someone does with their own one single copy.

          • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
            1·
            14 hours ago

            And if there are three copies of that book?

            I don’t get it, you’re acting like every book has an infinite number of copies available. Which is just factually incorrect.

            • Smoogs@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              12 hours ago

              No one here is stopping you from buying a copy. So stop talking like we are.

              In fact a good idea would be you buy a copy, scan it, share it to all those who you feel would hurt from it being so withheld.

              then you can stop whining about finite copies.

              Problem solved.

              • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
                11·
                12 hours ago

                Lmao, I don’t see much point in talking with you, you’d be happily skipping around while books were being burned telling people it’s fine, there are plenty of other books, these ones aren’t theirs.

                • Smoogs@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  1·
                  1 hour ago

                  This literally isnt book burning though. it is recording and recycling of (one) copy of (a) or even each book. Not even the original. One copy of many of each. One that you didnt even care about it until now.

                  So you calling it book burning or comparing it to actual book burning is misinformation.

                  And it is you willfully wasting your time here trying to convince somoeone of a lie you’re desperately trying to push here to control the emotion of others. Manipulation. A shit rage bait piece for attention and pandering to unnecessary anxiety and trying to depress other’s no doubt.

                  So if I am annoying you by calling out this shitty faćade:

                  Good.