• cinoreus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The confrontation, shared in a video that has circulated on Reddit, centres on a simple but uncomfortable question: should a doctor be wearing glasses with a built-in camera while examining a patient in an intimate clinical setting?

    I hate it when articles do this. Firstly, answer is NO. secondly there’s nothing uncomfortable about the question itself because answer is a NO, third there’s no need to frame a clear violation of privacy as a question. If it’s not acceptable to pull out a phone and start recording in that situation, then it’s clearly not acceptable to wear those glasses.

    • UnequalExchange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      “Is genocide OK if after you sweep away all those no-good ‘Undesireables’ you get to build a seaside villa and resort AND you now get to pump oil out of the ground from where those peoples’ homes once were? …Some experts say YES! And we agree! Here’s why…”

      -articles like these

      • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Movie trailer voice;

        This hour, a new sensation will sweep across the globe, the creators of “top 10 lists” return to ask the questions that nobody else will in “Articles Like These”, staring A.L. Clanker (coming soon to screens near you).

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      If the glasses were hipaa compliant, they could be used as a medical tool, but I would never trust Zuck’s glasses to be like that.