• Master@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    Absolutely fucking not. Im not going to lease something that contains my private information ever.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    I will go without. I will drag a PC and a mobile router everywhere I go before I rent a phone. Can these asshole corporate bullshitters just go to mars already so we can be free of them?

  • eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I only buy hardware which supports installing free/libre operating systems and applications.

    • StuffYouFear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Same, two to three year old phones for 10th the price on eBay as long as it states clean imse has been awsome

    • iglou@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s definitely also a reason why they’re thinking about this system. If people sell them back their old phones or lease them, the second hand market will suffer immensely.

    • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      My Samsung S10 has headphone jack and expandable storage 😎 7 year old phone, bought it used for $130

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s time for some right-of-first-sale legislation that kills off the subscription-for-everything scam.

    1. It should be illegal for a lack of a subscription to prevent operation of something you’ve bought.

    2. Same goes for requiring connectivity.

    3. If the subscription service terminates, reverse-engineering to maintain continuing operations should be protected by law, and the manufacturer should be required to provide the specifications to the public.

    4. DRM to prevent access to subscribable features should be illegal.

  • Sauvandu60@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Dumb coonsomer would get this dumb products and then wait for next new dumb products.

  • spaceracoon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I mean lots of mobile providers have been providing phones as part of their subscription model, that has going since the 2000s.

    That is not convenient at all, but some folks don’t want to downplay 1000+$ and they really want an iphone or whatever.

    It seems to me Apple and Samsung want to get their fair share of that (still sucks though cause its all in the “you don’t own anything”)

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Of course they want to make upgrading more attractive because it is less attractive now that it ever has been.

    If you want people to buy new stuff, making that stuff different from the old stuff they already own would be a good idea.

  • testaccount372920@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    The way I read that title: Apple and Samsung stopped innovating, now sales aren’t growing, so it’s time for enshittification.