• eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not could. It’s a mathematical certainty that it will. Barring a breakthrough miracle – fat chance.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      It really feels like the options are:

      • Bubble bursts because it requires more money than the entire global economy not too at this point.
      • Total regulatory capture and we just somehow keep it going forever to the detriment and gradual decay of literally everything else.
    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      An AI breakthrough has nothing to do with LLMs, it’s like saying the auto industry will collapse except if there is an AI breakthrough that saves it.

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s what a breakthrough means. But obviously all the funding is burned up in more DCs with incremental iteration on the same design. So the bubble has to pop for real innovation. But I think this coming AI winter will be permanent, as things are very visibly falling apart.

        • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well yeah, but my statement is true anyways IMO. Deep neural networks are unchanged since the eighties I guess, and again IMO it’s not they who need/can have a breakthrough, doubly especially since nobody seems to be working on anything else than “bigger datasets” and profiling and such.