The US research enterprise too heavily centers on elite research institutions, and fails individual researchers with bold ideas, suggests the White House Office of Science and Technology in a new report. The office recommends sweeping changes to where federal funding is spent and how it should be awarded.

Released on July 21, the Science: A New Golden Age report seeks to update Vannevar Bush’s landmark 1945 report Science: The Endless Frontier for the modern era. In the report, OSTP Director Michael Kratsios argues that today’s scientific landscape — shaped by AI, global competition, and private-sector investment — requires a fundamental redesign of how the federal government funds research.

Also on July 21, Kratsios and White House Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought jointly published a memorandum on the Trump administration’s R&D budget priorities for fiscal year 2028. The memo instructs science agencies to incorporate the administration’s priorities into their forthcoming budget requests, as well as develop implementation plans within 90 days for a series of “R&D priority practices.” Those include:

Developing new research funding mechanisms; Identifying and supporting top tech talent through, for example, early career and STEM-learning opportunities; Boosting the “science of science-funding” to evaluate which programs have the greatest impact; And collaborating with industry to drive greater private investment in R&D.

The memo directs agencies to rebalance their portfolios toward foundational research, and prioritize physical science over life science. Many of the administration’s priorities, including AI and nuclear fission, are dependent on computer science, physical science, and engineering, but the report notes that the latter two fields’ share of the federal research portfolio has declined over time, even as their strategic importance has grown.

  • CovertOperative@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    46 minutes ago

    The US research enterprise too heavily centers on people who know what the scientific method is elite research institutions, and fails idiots who do shit based on vibes individual researchers with bold ideas, suggests the White House Office of Science and Technology in a new report.

  • arotrios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Translation:

    They’re gutting any sort of science that provides benefits to people (life sciences, environmental, social) and putting the money into technology that is designed to control and hurt people (computer science = AI, while physical science and engineering = military application).

    At least that’s my take. Feels like they intentionally left the memorandum as vague as possible.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Not that it’s stopped them before but is this even legal? When congress allocated money toward cancer research, you can’t legally redirect it to proving renewable energy is bad for the environment or all vaccines cause autism

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The only ones that can call them out on that is congress. And right now Congress is being run by a bunch of boot licking Republicans and spineless Democrats.

  • ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    So the new drug and cancer vaccine clinical trials at the not for profit major cancer centers will be cancelled, and instead YouTube influencers claiming ivermectin cures all cancer will get their funding.
    Oh wait - physical science, so more money to oil and gas executives and tech bros?

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “Individual researchers”? Like those with fringe ideas that prevent them from joining those elite research institutes? Or like those who “prove” links between vaccination and autism, or “prove” that horse dewormer ist a genuine cure-it-all?

  • el_twitto@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Fuck the fucking idiots in the fucking Whitehouse. They are doing everything they can to wreck the future of this country. I swear they are all Russian assets.

    • bagsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Epstien worked for israel, and Maxwell’s father was a spy. The whole thing was a gigantic honeypot meant to ensnare stupid politicians into toeing the line.

      Its absoluety incredible than a couple decades and a few 10s of millions of dollars for party supplies was all it took to completely own the most powerful country on the planet.

      It was so successful, you really have to wonder how many more of these rings exist. There is no way epstien was the only one, we only know about him because he got caught.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The memo directs agencies to rebalance their portfolios toward foundational research, and prioritize physical science over life science.

    I mean yeah, why not. Listening to Peter Thiel’s hand puppet has certainly made America great so far.

    Who needs funding for life science research when we got parasites and diarrhea outbreaks? Every American a walking incubator at this point.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Im glad they figured out the US was starting to develop a lead in life science and are going out of there way to hobble us. /s

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I mean:

    “Released on July 21, the Science: A New Golden Age report seeks to update Vannevar Bush’s landmark 1945 report Science: The Endless Frontier for the modern era. In the report, OSTP Director Michael Kratsios argues that today’s scientific landscape — shaped by AI, global competition, and private-sector investment — requires a fundamental redesign of how the federal government funds research.”

    sooooo. in 1945 a report talking about ai and global competition was written. was this written by ai (the government thing or its press release)

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’d guess that the 1945 report was sound, although I haven’t read it. Vannevar Bush was a bright guy who came within a hair of predicting the modern Web at around the same time. He almost certainly didn’t mention AI in his report, since even expert systems and such were science fiction back then.

      The press release and the modern report? Both total garbage, I’m sure, regardless of whether they were written by an LLM or an overworked intern.