vegeta@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoDEF CON bans Meta-style 'pervert glasses'www.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square140linkfedilinkarrow-up1987arrow-down111
arrow-up1976arrow-down1external-linkDEF CON bans Meta-style 'pervert glasses'www.theregister.comvegeta@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square140linkfedilink
minus-squareLudrol@szmer.infolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 day agoHuman eyes are also sensitive to high intensity IR and UV light so you will also blind a human wearing them. Depending on the wavelength, permanently.
minus-squaremuusemuuse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·7 hours agoSo what? They were okay with wearing glasses anyway.
minus-squareGodric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·21 hours agoI’m already in favor of using high-powered lasers, you don’t have to keep convincing me
minus-squarenonentity@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agoI meant to include ‘strobe’ in the definition. A low duty cycle would cut down on the biological impact, and rapid, random cycling would help blind the sensors as they try to compensate.
minus-squareoyzmo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·22 hours agoLidar would probably do the trick
Human eyes are also sensitive to high intensity IR and UV light so you will also blind a human wearing them. Depending on the wavelength, permanently.
So what? They were okay with wearing glasses anyway.
I’m already in favor of using high-powered lasers, you don’t have to keep convincing me
I meant to include ‘strobe’ in the definition. A low duty cycle would cut down on the biological impact, and rapid, random cycling would help blind the sensors as they try to compensate.
Lidar would probably do the trick