• FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    As far as I’m concerned the best way of making smart glasses with a focus on privacy is to not make them at all. Or at least don’t stick a camera on it.

    • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think you hit the nail with ‘no camera’. Honestly, a camera isn’t needed… if you want a picture, use your phone. If you want a POV image or video, use a Go Pro.

      Smart glasses should be a display only (well, maybe speakers too).

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s also possible to have a camera but explicitly no persistent recording built into the hardware design. purely ephemeral video analysis for whatever UI/HUD data you want.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I like the concept of having a display in your glasses. I just don’t fathom why would you also put a camera on them.

      • benjirenji@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you want to align virtual content with the real world in any way you need a camera attached. Sure, you can use the display for notifications and content that doesn’t care where you’re facing, but having a display attached to your face is a too juicy scenario not to do more with it.

        • dev_null@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          If you want to align virtual content with the real world

          I don’t though. Display and notifications covers everything I’d want. And if I need it to show me details about a business I’m facing, great, add GPS and a compass and it will know.