• null@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I never thought of doing that with ffmpeg. Why ffmpeg, instead of imagmagick?

    • Aniki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      ffmpeg is on any system, has a consistent user interface for many different conversions

    • 8uurg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      It just so happens that many video codecs are based on image formats, so ffmpeg already has a lot of the complex machinery to do so available to also implement these image formats - internally it can just handle it as a single frame of video with specialized formats for that.

      Imagemagick (and other tools) also work, but why use multiple pieces of software if what you already have is adequate? ImageMagick is also software, and can also have vurnabilities.