• MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    but I don’t actually know.

    You keep saying this and then repeat the same argument.

    GraphenOS is entirely reliant on the devs at Google, because they update the device tree, drivers and patch security issues. If Google stopped doing that tomorrow, Graphen is fucked. They would be stuck on whatever driver they had last with all the issues that one brings.

    The “only” thing Graphen adds is additional hardening and some customization and sandboxing code.

    I just looked up this ubuntu

    Lol, this ubuntu. Not knowing one of the, if not the single most well known Linux distro is already telling enough.

    From what I skimmed it’s not hardened, and 10 years behind graphene, but I don’t actually know.

    It’s not “behind” GraphenOS, it’s something entirely different. And the hardening is what money could be poured into, along with the other issues it still has. Still, none of these issues is being owned by Google.

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I will take all of that under advisement. I only know what I’ve heard from OS enthusiasts, and they pump graphene principally.

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Of course they do, especially compared to stock android. I would run it if they supported my phone.

        I am not saying Graphen is bad or anything like that. Its just build on a shaky foundation. But if you have a phone that supports it, it’s a great alternative to stock