• kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I’m not an economist, so here’s my ass talking, but I don’t think your example scales out. I think you’re making the mistake of equating the stock market to the economy. It isn’t.

    Not everyone wins in a failing economy. If one billionaire makes out, three more lose money.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Not everyone wins in a failing economy. If one billionaire makes out, three more lose money.

      No, yeah, that’s true. But the billionaires are also competing with each other in a (perceived) zero-sum game and they believe the ones who are cozying closest to Trump will be the best ones positioned to make money - either in a corrupt or a failing economy. But every recession has been a golden opportunity for billionaires.

      Heck, in post-collapse Russia, this is how oligarchs first appeared - the “shock therapy” of the 1990s transition to a market economy dropped the value of resources to nothing, and the rich at the time bought them and became the ultra-rich. Some didn’t make it. ( Like a super-bacteria forming from the ones not killed by antibiotics, the ones that survived were even more resistant to control.)

      • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Good example, especially given that it looks like a Russian oligarchy is where we’ve been headed since 2016