• NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Ya, I don’t buy the hype around AGI. Like a Waymo drove into a telephone pole because of something they had to fix in their code. I’m not doubting there’s AI involved, neural nets, machine learning, whatever, but this isn’t an AGI type level development. Nor do I think they need an AGI to do this.

    I’m also not convinced this LLM stuff can ever lead to AGI either. I think it can do some pretty impressive things with some very real drawbacks/caveats and there is definitely room to keep improving them, but that the whole architecture is flawed if you want to make an AGI.

    • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Nor do I think they need an AGI to do this.

      Yeah I guess theres a lot of interesting stuff we can do with AI without necessarily achieving AGI. What about programming? Even if we don’t get AGI soon, do you still think LLMs will be snatching up a sizeable chunk of programming jobs?