Lots of venture capital money behind it. I wonder how quickly the enshitification will begin.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      142
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Anything that takes users away from Reddit, and forces Reddit to compete, is a plus for me.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s a fair point. Reddit has been openly hostile to its own users these past several years. It might help moderate that to have another alternative on the table, even if it too is a soulless corporate enterprise.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          it got worst within the last year. they ban new users and old inactive accounts extremely fast. of course you can say its due to bots using same methods, this hasnt stopped bots in any case at all. its just targetting lowest hanging fruits.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        2 days ago

        Being owned by venture capitalists is pretty much an assurance that they’ll turn it to shit as much as they can get away with. The entire reason people abandoned digg for reddit in the first place was because it was selling out to ad space and shill accounts and manipulation. The venture capitalists will want big returns on their investments.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          reddit is partially being propped up by google. most of thier AI comes from google, and thier moderation, BOT DETECTION,etc.

      • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is quite toxic attitude. You should focus on what’s good for you - not what’s bad for someone else.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          But competition IS good for me.

          If people start migrating to better experience and better communities, they’re going to have to step up to stop the bleeding.

          Reddit can get away with making terrible user experiences and killing 3rd party solutions because no alternative has lured enough of their base away.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t agree. We’re not talking about a person or a charity. We’re talking about a VC-backed company. They can fuck off and die, and it’s not toxic – it’s just common sense.

          • hector@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            But two corporate entities competing are better than one secure in it’s market share. Anyone with any sense would reject both for a fediverse option if it could be made to work well enough obviously but still.

            • mpramann@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Only marginally… maybe. Duopolies are still really shitty for consumers and that’s the best outcome to this. Significantly better would be if more people would realise what made internet amazing in the beginning and that logical consequences from that are that public spaces in the internet where the content comes from the people should be owned by the people.

      • ILoveUnions@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        Dunny. I’ve mentioned it a few times. I don’t think they’re still removing them but I bet they are still suppressing them

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          they dont care about links as much as if you commented with the links in your posts. and also if your account is old and active enough they are less likely to “ban you”

      • OpenStars@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        I heard that was highly community-dependent - the more high-profile a community the more likely for it to be removed.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Idk, but now that you mention iy, I got a 2nd violation, for threatening violence that did not do so or even come close, to the point I think it was ad hoc in bad faith, to say for other reasons. I did mention lemmy not long before.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        If they are advertising on Digg may work.

        I’d like to see this place just a bit better

    • YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m starting to agree. Was a bit quiet and every other post oddly seemed to be about Linux when I first signed up, but now I really like it. I’ve decided to stay.