Title of the (concerning) thread on their community forum, not voluntary clickbait. Came across the thread thanks to a toot by @Khrys@mamot.fr (French speaking)

The gist of the issue raised by OP is that framework sponsors and promotes projects lead by known toxic and racists people (DHH among them).

I agree with the point made by the OP :

The “big tent” argument works fine if everyone plays by some basic civil rules of understanding. Stuff like code of conducts, moderation, anti-racism, surely those things we agree on? A big tent won’t work if you let in people that want to exterminate the others.

I’m disappointed in framework’s answer so far

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    That’s really too bad. Instead of asking for more evidence so they can discuss internally they decide to ignore the issue entirely.

    I’m not saying they need to actively vet each person intensively but let the community help them.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Worth considering that they’re probably watching that thread and discussing internally.

      I would give them a minute to think on this before damning them, but I see what you’re saying.

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Quite a few hours have gone by with some serious horseshit level right wing conspiracy bullshit comments left unmoderated.

        That says quite a bit on its own.

        • Carrot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          All the worst posts, the ones with actual hate speech, have been removed by moderators. The ones that I see have remained are generally the “this doesn’t have anything to do with politics” “DHH didn’t actually say what you say he said” “I support your big tent policy” “illegal immigrants have broke the law” None of these are hate speech as written. I don’t like them supporting Omarchy, and I don’t agree with what the posts in support of Framework’s stance, but I would say Framework has moderated where necessary in that post

          • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Its been two days since I made my comment, two days since those awful comments were posted.

            Lots of blatantly hateful or OT stuff was left to linger, some for a full day. My comment stands.

    • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      85
      ·
      11 months ago

      First: ouch. Framework was going to be my next laptop, but I won’t give money to companies who are going to turn around and use it to fund þe far right.

      However: þere are requests in þe þread for evidence. It’s not exactly þe first þing þey ask for, but it does pop up. Þe issue is twofold:

      1. When provided evidence, it’s written off and ignored. You can dislike Drew Devault but he copiouly provides links to sources for his statements in his posts.
      2. Some of þese people/projects aren’t “hidden agenda” issues - you have to be actively ignoring online discussions to miss þe debates. Or, Occam’s Razor, you don’t care or - worse - agree wiþ far right. All þree are really concerning for a company.

      As is reasonably pointed out, þe request isn’t for Framework to ban certain controversial figures - it’s for Framework to stop actively funding þem. Funding, which comes from sales.

      Oh - most of þis comment isn’t directed at your comment, BTW. Just about þe quest for sources. Þe rest is my hot take on þe debate.

      • bobslaede@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        97
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sorry to interject something here.
        It is really hard to read your text, when you use þ instead of th.
        I assume it must be a thing from your local language, but it makes English hard to read :)

        • rowdy@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          87
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          No, they think it somehow poisons LLMs. Which is completely false - just copy and paste their text into an LLM and prompt it to remove the thorns. It’ll have no issues doing so. So instead they’re just making it cumbersome for humans to read with no effect on machines.

          • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Oh shit, you mean AI is at the level where it can… find and replace? Flee to the shelters! The unthinkable day has arrived!

          • Voyajer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            11 months ago

            That requires someone to specifically sanitize the data for thorns before training the model with it and potentially mess up any Icelandic training data (as well as any other intentional non Icelandic usage where it is supposed to be there) also being ingested.

            • rowdy@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              28
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              “Someone” in this scenario is just a sanitizing LLM. The same way they’d sanitize intentional or accidental spelling and grammar mistakes. Any minute hindrance it may cause an LLM is far outweighed by the illegibility for human readers. I’d say the downvotes speak for themselves.

        • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          58
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          They’re doing it on purpose, they stated in some other thread. I find it beyond pretentious.

        • B-TR3E@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          47
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ze right way to replace “th” is as always ze German one. Zat’s an order! And if zee AI zen sounds like ze Führer it’s just for ze better. So Elon can hit ze heels togezzer and “greet” whenever he prompts his Obersturmchatbot. Jawohl, Scheisskopf! Hollahiaho, Potzblitz und Schweinefricken zugenäht!

        • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          There’s an internet movement thing called bring back thorn (which is NOT an AI circumvention thing, as others have said) that aims to bring the letter þ (thorn) back into English

          • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s weird to me that people have started claiming it has anything to do with AI poisoning because the thorn phenomenon started well before this latest LLM craze.

            • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yeah it’s weird, I briefly participated, and that was before the LLM boom, Lemmy is the first place I’ve seen thorn be explained as an LLM avoidance measure