• shads@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I got stuck today in a part of my workplace where they have one of the local shitty radio stations playing, couldn’t have my headphones in as people kept coming up and talking to me, and a shitty pop music mashup plays and it struck me, this is AI.

    To clarify there is some shitty artist who gets the credit, but its just a selection of clips crossfaded and slightly processed into each other to make a new “song” out of a dozen pop songs. No actual creativity, no new material, just a quasi algorithmic blending of songs so that some soulless talentless grifter can claim they are an artist.

    It gets deeper though, as mixed in there are songs that couldn’t actually be performed live and acoustic due to the amount of sound engineering and vocal processing that went into the original versions of these songs.

    The whole thing is turning into an Ouroboros, they have worked out how to make perfectly bland, meaningless music and now the snake is eating its tail as the industry consumes that slop to manufacture more slop.

    Yet deeper, why does this beige bullshit get air time… Why its our old friend capitalist market forces, no one passionate about music wants to make this shit, its the people who want the fame and money and view music as the means to that end.

    We know that AI makes people dumber, we know that it leads to the atrophy of skill and talent, and we know the only motivation for its use is capitalist. AI is pop music.

    For what its worth I used italics on AI as I categorically refuse to believe this garbage is actually artificial intelligence. I am reasonably certain that actual artificial intelligence is the next fusion power, it’s going to be “only a few years away” from being viable until well after I die, but its just too good a marketing term to leave it alone while we make do with these stunted chinese rooms.

    Wow that rant blew up.

    • shads@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ahh down votes in lieu of a substantive argument. Love it. If there wasn’t a thread to pull on in all that word salad that would unravel the tapestry do you think maybe there’s something to my take on this matter?

      Anyway, don’t care, this isn’t Reddit so a downvote doesn’t mean shit, and you at least read some of my post. To quote a somewhat famous Doctor “Don’t you think she looks tired?”

    • frostysauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Tell me you’ve never written a song without telling me you’ve never written a song…

      • shads@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Maybe I am misreading your comment here, but I am going to take it on face value, I have never written a song. In an interesting note I believe cutting pages out of a bunch of books and sticking them together in a new binding wouldn’t make a compelling read, I also have never written a novel.

        I seriously respect people who can write songs, I would imagine they have or had passion for the art. I seriously doubt any song writer is out there thinking "Holy fuck this song is amazing, I really hope some shithead producer crops the chorus and mashes it together with a bunch of other tracks to make it completely meaningless. That would make it perfect.’

  • imposedsensation@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sounds like a desperate tactic to show value to investors who are skeptical of all the insane level of cap ex… not to mention all the customers who don’t want to pay for this garbage

  • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This part really stuck out for me:

    This is the latest example of a strange marketing strategy by AI companies. Instead of selling products based on helpful features and letting users decide, executives often deploy scare tactics that essentially warn people they will become obsolete if they don’t get on the AI bandwagon.

    If hype doesn’t work, try threats!

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Bro you are literally not necessary, not even the best at what you do. See everyone on codeberg.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Threatening remarks like that are why I learned PHPUnit and XDebug, and yeah it made me become a better developer, but often times these are just empty statements.

    AI is just another tool in my toolbox, but it’s not everything.

    • MoondropLight@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Unit testing and TDD are awesome; but if you can avoid it: Don’t write things in PHP (unless it’s for work).

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve written a few personal projects in Laravel too, I don’t mind modern PHP tbh. It’s good for spinning up web apps quickly.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    While I don’t wish for this future, I do look forward to being one of the few that truly understands the ‘old way’ of computing like many here on Lemmy. All that knowledge I spent my youth acquiring may very well become insanely valuable in the next few decades because so many people will treat it as irrelevant.

    I’ll feel a lot like this:

  • rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I don’t get it. AI is a tool. My CEO didn’t care about what tools I use, as long as I got the job done. Why do they suddenly think they have to force us to use a certain tool to get the job done? They are clueless, yet they think they know what we need.

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They are clueless, yet they think they know what we need.

      AI make money line go up. It’s not clueless, he’s trying to sell a kind of snake oil (ok, not “snake oil”, I don’t think AI is entirely bad).