• nahostdeutschland@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Let’s be honest: Everything that might be “worse” or “annoying” in Firefox for someone is not relevant in comparison to “no working adblocker available”. A browser without adblock is unusable

    • P1nkman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      True, but if an adblocker no longer works on a specific browser, change your browser! I started using Netscape back in '94, and lost count on how many browsers I’ve tested and used in the past… Holy shit, 30+ years!!

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        In the past 10 years it’s pretty much just been Firefox, Safari, Explorer/Edge, and Chrome. 99% of browsers are just skinned Chrome. Even Edge now. Opera’s engine died in 2013.

        • P1nkman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          99% if browsers are just skinned Chrome.

          Yup. Hence, the reason I originally suggested to use Firefox, only because it’s not built on Chromium.

          • AJ1@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Hence, the reason I originally suggested to use Firefox

            Just FYI, the word “hence” literally means “for this reason”. So you just said “for this reason the reason” lol.

          • Bourff@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Chrome forked Webkit in 2012 to create Blink. It is reasonable to assume they have somewhat diverged since.

          • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            They’re developed separately. It’s a hard fork so I consider them different.

            • hddsx@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Man I haven’t been around that long but I feel like some of my knowledge is outdated and I have to start with “a long time ago in a galaxy far far away” because I stopped paying attention

      • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        30+ years!

        …fuck off, '94 wasn’t 30… counts on fingers several times

        …Shit…

        • Teal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It doesn’t sound right but it is. I think in ‘94 I was using Juno for email and internet. Shortly after that it was time to actually use one of the many AOL trial discs for service instead of a mini frisbee/ninja star.

          Modem sounds, chat rooms, you’ve got mail. What a time to live!

        • P1nkman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I know… Jurassic Park is 33 years this year. It would be like watching a movie from the 60’ when it was released.

          We’re old, friend.

    • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      What issues do people even have with firefox? Its a browser, it seems fast enough. Isn’t that all most people need from a browser

      • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Mainly that Google intentionally makes its sites (like YouTube or Google Docs) slower and less useable when they detect you’re using Firefox, and/or ad blockers (which you need Firefox to use, so same difference).

        It’s mostly fixable with add-ons and userscripts (and eventually, one hopes, with an antitrust lawsuit), but it’s still a hassle.

        • gi1242@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          how do I find out more about this and what scripts do I need to make the sites faster again on Firefox

          • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            https://www.tomshardware.com/news/youtube-responds-to-delayed-loading-in-rival-browser-complaints, for instance.

            Or https://www.zdnet.com/article/former-mozilla-exec-google-has-sabotaged-firefox-for-years/, for an older one.

            As for how to fix it, Mozilla tend to do a pretty good job of eventually working around Google’s bullshit, so keeping the browser updated is a good first step.

            Since Google tends to roll this stuff out regionally and doing A/B testing, though, the best way is to identify what specific handicap they’re hassling you with (which specific features don’t work or don’t work right, when they work properly on chrome), and look for an updated add on or userscript to fix that particular issue.

            Or you can just look for a generic YouTube or Google Docs “enhancer” add on and hope it fixes the issue without making the whole user experience too different from what you’re used to.

              • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                At one particular point it was, if I recall correctly, though Chrome also (mis)implements some standards its own way, so Google might also use that as a form of attack against anyone who implements them properly, much like Microsoft did in the bad old IE6 days…

                It’s all a silly arms race, though, with Google coming up with new ways to enshittify the web for anyone not using Chrome or using ad blockers and Mozilla and ad blocker (and alternative YouTube frontend) developers trying to figure out what they broke this time and how to fix it, so what worked yesterday might not work today and work again tomorrow.

                It’s all a profoundly stupid waste of everyone’s time and resources (all for a few more ad views) which will hopefully end up with Google losing their monopoly position on the web like the Internet Explorer bullshit did for Microsoft, but will keep being a major hassle for everyone until it does.

      • Zier@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Too many people complain about the UI and claim it’s “outdated, ugly, unusable”. I find that funny because you can make FF look almost like anything you want, and I personally hate chrome’s UI.

        • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m one of those complaining about the UI. Used the TabMixPlus extension to adjust the UI to my liking. FF killed it. So, I started customizing the UI CSS. Every few versions, Mozilla changed the browser enough to invalidate my changes. After a while, I got tired of thiz and switched to Vivaldi, which is Chromium based.