• robbinhood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I mean yeah, it can work exactly that way. The Cold War was horrifically bloody in many countries and regions, but the USA and USSR directly slugging it out would have bathed the world in much more blood. Likewise, the Soviets and China going at it in a full scale war after the Soviet-Sino split would have been horrific.

    It’s a high risk strategy but not one without rewards.

    • Magnus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      In that instance there were only two guys with sticks, if I understood you correctly you want to add another stick to the mix.

      • robbinhood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        There were three guys with sticks. China couldn’t project power far but Soviet-Sino relations were strained and the risk of war was high because they share borders.

        I’d love for there to be a world with no sticks period but humanity is a long way from that. Europe becoming the forth guy with a stick could force everyone else, and especially Russia, to be more cautious. And if it comes to blows, the EU/UK are gonna want to have that stick.

        If you’re EU/UK and multiple parties are around you with big sticks, would you rather be defenseless or have a stick?