• Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ehh just fight it for a month pay king trump some money and bam their golden.

  • 200ok@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they’re allowed to choose who they sell it to this won’t change anything

  • 200ok@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker, says the DOJ is pushing “a radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.”

    I’m honestly curious how this would “harm Americans”.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google pretending they have any other nationality other then “the global internet” is cute in a disgusting way.

      • Beldarofremulak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everyone really does need to have that at the forefront of their mind. When the C-suit, wall street, and politicians talk about “Americans” they aren’t talking about us schlubs.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The same ruling would ban Google from paying other browsers to make Google the default search engine.
      This would kill Firefox and make Chromium the only browser engine that’s left.

      • ferret@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would leave the newly-split-off chrome in the same financial situation as firefox. Arguably a worse one.

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Just…please for the love of whatever diety do Microsoft. Fucking sick of their shit recently with One Drive.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    They should force it to become a worker cooperative. It’s the only solution that doesn’t allow for corruption

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the last antitrust win we’ll get for years, isn’t it?

    I know Trump doesn’t like Big Tech, but I doubt his admin will punish them meaningfully, but just rail about censorship.

    • babybus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t a win I think. They are yet to meet in the court with Google.

      The DOJ will file a revised version of its proposals in early March, before the government and Google return to the DC District Court in April for a two-week remedies trial.

    • net00@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, Google pays other companies lots of money to have its search engine enabled by default. That’s what the lawsuit argued, so I’m not sure how separating chrome from the company will change that…

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What the what?

    “sell your browser, that’ll limit your search monopoly”

    . . . HAH?

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    People wondering what Chrome has to do with a search monopoly:

    The obvious benefit is that they can default the user’s search provider to Google.

    But the more nefarious benefit is that, by controlling both the client and server, they can unilaterally decide the future of web standards. They don’t have to advocate for proposals, gain consensus, and limit themselves to well-supported standards the way other companies do. They can just do it, gain the first-mover advantage, and force others to follow suit.

    If they don’t like HTTP/2, they can invent their own protocol and implement it for their search servers and Chrome. Suddenly, using Chrome with Google Search is way faster than using Chrome with Bing or using Firefox with Google Search. Even if Microsoft and Mozilla don’t like the protocol, they now have to adopt it or fall behind.

    This has happened. QUIC was deployed in 2012. Firefox gained support in 2021.

    They’re doing the same thing with Privacy Sandbox, and you can also look at browser feature compatibility tables to see how eager Google is to force their own interpretation of every not-yet-finalized web standard as the canonical interpretation.

    Edit: Also, JPEG XL vs. WebP.

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s literally so much else they should do, google docs, sheets, drive, phones, maps, earth, calendar, play store, translate, etc.
    Good work, continue please.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What is the issue with docs, sheets, drive, phones, calendar, play store?

      There seems to be plenty of options in all of these spaces. Play store isn’t even on a lot of android devices.