Note: Original report by Bloomberg, article by Reuters proxied by Neuters to bypass paywall.

  • barkingspiders@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lit. It’s a good ask although it’s not clear what separation means here. Not going to hold my breath, the big corpos seem to usually win these kind of games.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google is such a good company, one the best. Everybody says it. I was just talking to John Google the other day, and he tells me, no really he did, he tells me we’re going to do amazing things together. Oogles of googles. That’s what we’ll sell. Everybody will know about google by this time next year. It’s true.

  • vortexal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this happens, I’d be interested in seeing how this effects ChromeOS. I don’t use it but my mom does.

    Also, if you’re confused as to why ChromeOS would be effected, while it’s based on Gentoo Linux, ChromeOS uses a modified version of Chrome as it’s Desktop Environment.

    • btaf45@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes I would like to know what that means for ChromeOS and Chromebooks. If the new “Chrome” company got ChromeOS also that would be huge. But if that is not a requirement Google could just put another Chromium browser in ChromeOS. They could also continue to sell Chromebooks but based on a ChromiumOS fork.

  • julianwgs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I‘ve actually when something like this will happen. A few years ago German energy providers and distributors needed to split, because it gives you an unfair advantage if you own both. Whole companies were split in two. People working for years together would no longer work together. In the end consumer were much better off after the split. I feel the same way with internet browser. It is unfair if you own the infrastructure (Chrome, energy grid) and the services that run on it (YouTube, power plants).

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The US did this to AT&T. It was broken up into dozens of “baby bells”. Then it gradually bought them all back up and now it’s as big as it ever was

  • nyan@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And whoever buys it won’t also have some kind of ulterior motive? Chrome isn’t likely to be a money-maker on its own. If it were, Firefox would have less trouble staying afloat. Anyone who buys Chrome most likely will have plans for it that are no more in the end-user’s best interest than Google’s.

  • Scrollone@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It will never happen. But it would be a good thing for the openness of the web. More Firefox, less Chrome.

    • tomatoely@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wouldn’t it put Firefox on a pickle? Say Chrome gets bought out of Google’s hands, would they still bother to pay half a billion to Firefox to stay as the default search engine? Could Firefox survive being financially independent?

    • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What? The fact it’s owned & developed by Google is the whole point

      This is how the DOJ is planning to approach dismantling Google’s illegal monopoly, by breaking chrome - the world’s most used browser - away from them

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    How do you force someone to sell something thats open source?

    Can the government please force me to sell my open source software too? If they could be my sales department, I’d love that. Pretty please.

    • btaf45@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see how a “Chrome” company would make any money. Now if the Chrome Company also owned ChromeOS and Chromebooks that might be interesting. But it could also be bad, because such a company would probably want to take a cut of every Chromebook in order to actually make money.

    • ccdfa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Chromium is open source, Google bases their Chrome off of it, but Chrome is not open source.

  • normalexit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This seems like a sensible consumer protection to not let the ad company control the biggest web browser. I won’t hold my breath, but I’m glad they are trying something.

    AWS should also be split from Amazon.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      AWS is amazing’s money maker, they might as well just sell Amazon and keep AWS lol

      • kiagam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Microsoft having IE/Edge as the default browser has already cost them in the past. I don’t think Apple faced anything with Safari.

        The problem today with chrome is how prevalent it is and how that influences the main product of the internet (advertising), which happens to be Google’s mais product too. Apple can at least make the argument that they make their money with the hardware, not the browser.

        Either way, I think all OS should at least give you a list of browsers on first use to choose from.

        • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Either way, I think all OS should at least give you a list of browsers on first use to choose from.

          I like this idea if only because it means I don’t have the default web browser hanging around only ever having been used to download another web browser.

        • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, I remember the MS/IE issue in the past. I never understood why Apple wasn’t held to the same scrutiny. They don’t have the corporate hold like Windows does, so maybe that was why.

          So if Google has to sell off Chrome, what happens to Chromebooks? It runs on ChromeOS with Chrome being the main interface. Could Google not spin off Chrome as another company?

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is probably the real reason corporate America had no interest in endorsing Harris.