• supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        One is a product with investors selling itself on promises of decentralization (bluesky), the other is a genuine community tool (mastodon) that actually provides decentralization.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not 100% sure but I don’t think anything would stop either a fork or a new app that uses the same protocol.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mastodon is more of a protocol than a single service. It succeeds/fails on those terms, in the same way the old Web1.0 protocols did. Which is to say, you can’t enshitify a thousand micro-sites at once like you can enshittify one big site that’s under central control. But you also can’t do things like navigate, search, and socialize efficiently.

      Mastodon is successful in large part because it isn’t. When you let a single cartel of corporate psychos run a Mastodon account like they would a Twitter or Facebook, you end up with Truth Social (literally just a Mastodon branch instance).

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        ActivityPub is the protocol though. Mastodon is an implementation of the protocol.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There was a good explanation about why not mastodon the other day. It basically boils down to Bluesky is just an easier transition.