• cholesterol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    The dump truck, at 45 tons, ascends the 13-percent grade and takes on 65 tons of ore. With more than double the weight going back down the hill, the beast’s regenerative braking system recaptures more than enough energy to refill the charge the eDumper used going up.

    • ladicius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      So the energy this truck uses is harnessed via mining and loading… Essentially this energy was stored in the ore via geological processes.

      This truck uses continental drift as his fuel.

    • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      So it was designed for this mine I guess?

      I’m not sure there’s a lot of mine you’re going down filled up, the images I have in mind are quite the opposite, but that’s a really cool idea!

      There actually is some design to stock energy this way, with weights you lift while having excess energy

      • groet@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Depends on the scale of “going down”. Many mines are in the mountains and the material has to be brought down to lower elevations. The mine entry may be lower than the nearest pass but still a lot higher than the destination of the ore.

        • TomSelleck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Open pit is much more common for this type of equipment and it’s basically a reverse mountain. Still might be enough regenerative braking from just the weight of the truck though.

          • groet@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            An open pit at an elevation of 1.5km still means the bottom of the pit could be 1km higher than the place the ore is processed at

  • Soleos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    EV never has to be recharged… Because it recharges on the way downhill.

    “World’s largest EV never has to be plugged in” is sufficiently click-baity without being so dumbly self contradicting

  • mEEGal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    well that was unexpected

    I’m curious if the desgin team knew about it in advance

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Amateurs.

    The 1963 Černý Důl – Kunčice nad Labem aerial ropeway is over 8 km (5 mi) long, over 30 m high in places and carries 135 tons of limestone every hour from a quarry to the nearest train station. Its 120kW 3-phase synchronous motor requires power for a few minutes at the start and end of each day when most of the 800kg-capacity trolleys are empty, and spends most of the shift generating mains electricity and acting as a speed governor. Unlike the EV, it is fully autonomous most of the way, only 5 people are required to operate it including loading and unloading. The quarry will continue operation as long as it pays off, then the ropeway will be scrapped (projected 2033). A dude illegally rode the way up on it somewhat recently.

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Till elon finds out that if he manages to cover the sun, he can charge us on sunscription

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I read the story.

    I saw the comments on the story

    I laughed at the pedantic slapfights happening in the comments.

    I came here to comment on the neat story and poke fun at the silliness, to find the same pedantic slapfights here.

    Sigh.

  • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    “World’s largest EV”

    Blatantly untrue. Larger EVs have been in use for more than a century at this point in the form of EMU trains.

    • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ll pick up the pedantic torch. Trains are made of train cars, I’d argue each one is a separate car or vehicle even though they’re strapped together.

      I feel like The ISS ticks a lot of the boxes for a vehicle though, how big is that?

      • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Sure, but quite often in EMUs the cars come in sets that can’t operate disconnected from each other, so I’d argue that they still comprise a single vehicle.

        I’d argue that the ISS, due to lacking means of propulsion (unless you count explosive decompression) is not a vehicle.

        • shai_hulud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          The ISS has two different propulsion systems and has used them to avoid debris. I don’t think that it has enough power to leave orbit and reach greater altitude.

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Very interesting use case but kind of dependant on this very specific setup? I feel like an even more efficient and low maintenance method would be like… a ramp.

  • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Does it discharge extra energy into anything else? Does it burn off extra energy as heat to maintain regenerative braking?

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    yes it does. just going by the numbers posted operating in the space it does results in a net loss of12% battery each trip.