• chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow. It’s almost like we’ve been warning for years that putting backdoors into software, systems, and encryption would allow nefarious parties to exploit them.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And this is why the NSA is supposed to close exploits rather than harvest them for surveillance.

      This is why surveillance backdoors are always bad, and you can’t math around that.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      US did not need to hack, they just said they need the key… How did china get these keys?

      Are our glowies selling state secrets now?

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    What?? But the FBI called dibs on that backdoor! /s

    It’s almost like putting backdoors into software as a whole is a bad idea cause anyone who knows of it can use it, not just “tHe GoOd GuYs”

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      cause anyone who knows of it can use it

      …and the ones who don’t know of it will one day become the ones who know

  • LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Article author struggles with clean links

    https://www.wsj.com/tech/cybersecurity/u-s-wiretap-systems-targeted-in-china-linked-hack btw

    The pioneers of this dirty business were overwhelmingly founded by ex-Israeli signals intelligence personnel,

    That’s interesting. Must be a coincidence.

    and related Clinton-era initiatives, like the failed Clipper Chip program, which would have put a spy chip in every computer, and, eventually, every phone and gadget:

    “Don’t worry, guys we tried to backdoor all devices but failed, see?”

    Meanwhile, Intel ME, AMD “Secure Processor”, and ARM “TrustZone”:

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This article is getting saved, for the next time some idiot proposes ‘lawful backdoors’, which will inevitably happen.

        • adr1an@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Those locks are kinda optional. And luggage is way less important than all of one’s communication ; imho.

          • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh absolutely, but it does do something that I’m not sure people realize: it normalizes the idea of a government agent holding the keys to all of your stuff.

          • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The bad part is when people take a luggage lock and use it for their Gym locker, or the locker at the pool. Somewhere that really REALLY shouldn’t be using a weak lock with a readily available master key.

  • aluminium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t buy Huawei Networking gear, if we get hacked it has the be through our own backdoor.