• circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    176
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Please, everyone, stop using Chrome. This is an easy vote with your wallet that doesn’t even require your wallet.

    Complacency means the internet gets worse, ads get worse, nickel and diming gets worse. It’s the easiest chance to take a stand you’ll ever have.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      What’s Opera based on? My friends mostly use Mac, so they all use Opera and Chrome, but I have gotten them to stop using Chrome.

      • Angius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Nearly every browser is Chromium-based. Additionally, Opera is Chinese-owned.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          32
          ·
          2 years ago

          So? It isn’t google. Also google and Mozilla have Asian employees so I guess you’ll have to be not racist.

          I do agree that the Chinese government is problematic though.

          • kattenluik@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            I’d like to point out that they said nothing about it being a bad thing and that all they did was say it was Chinese-owned, hence making your comment a pointless attack of nonsense.

            • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I’d like to point out that they said nothing about it being a bad thing

              I think it’s pretty clear that that’s exactly what they were implying. What is it that you think they meant by that?

              And I agree with them. I also agree that it’s not racist but anything Chinese is pretty much defacto-owned and operated by the CCP.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Opera was bought by a Chinese data analytics company, and once that happened, they scrapped their engine and used chromium to save money.

        They have questionable CCP ties too.

          • Sentau@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Maybe use that information to try and influence the public in the same way that cambridge analytica did for the 2016 elections.

          • stevehobbes@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            lol. This thread is about people mad that google is doing it, and you’re saying so what if a nation state does it?

            The answer is the same either way - to either sell the data to a party who want to manipulate you into doing or thinking what they want or by directly manipulating you into doing or thinking what they want.

            Same with Reddit and lemmy. It doesn’t take a whole lot of investment (on a state level actor basis) to manipulate small and large communities or individuals into thinking something is normal or mainstream. Or convincing them that everyone loves this product or it’s so popular or whatever.

            The CCP censors their entire internet for their people and collects all sorts of information to root out dissidents. What good thing do you think is going to come from them having that data?

    • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Give it time. Greed is greed, just a matter of time. Personally I’m back to use the old carrier pigeon. Kinda slow but probably still better than dialup

      Edit: Either y’all don’t get this was a joke, or haven’t been alive long enough to watch your hero’s die.

      Either way, fuck Google, sorry to rain on the parade

    • nintendoit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      But donating your money can not make firefox independent.It will only make firefox more revenue.

      Google wants to keep mozilla afloat to stay out of anti-competitive allegations.

      • sep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        If mozilla gets market share, google will defund them. That mozilla have a money will help.

        Also mozilla’s other projects are also good ;)

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 years ago

          Also big CEO wallets.
          Nothing in comparison to others but there is some special pay going.

          But it’s definitely the lesser of the evils.

        • aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          Some of Mozilla’s other projects are good, iirc there was a journalist a few years ago who chronicled how Mozilla had donated a lot of money to other charities unrelated to it’s goal rather than reinvesting in the business so that it can try to ween off of Google reliance.

      • Madis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 years ago

        And the money won’t go to Firefox, but Mozilla’s other projects.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Firefox has been my go-to, but I’ve left Chrome installed just to have on hand incase some website fuckiness could be solved with a browser change.

    Naw. It’s not worthy of staying around even for that. Time to completely scrub my devices of google.

    • WYLD_STALLYNS@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Feeling the same, it’s surprising how many companies are just leaning towards screwing users for a few more pennies on the dollar. Eventually, Google with be the next AOL.

    • ghostatnoon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve been doing similar; been using Firefox, but Chrome is installed for its browser-wide automatic captioning. Not something I need often, but I rely on it for the occasional remote meeting here and there. I’m sure free automatic captioning applications exist for my operating system, but I’d have to actually test each one to see if they actually work, and it’s just been so convenient keeping Google’s around.

      (Speaking of which, if anybody happens to have recommendations for free automatic captioning software that works on Ubuntu, I seem to be in the market…)

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I suggest to use chromium as the backup “in case a webpage doesn’t work on Firefox” browser. All the compatibility but no telemetry.

      • eric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        But why use chromium or any chromium based browser since google disabled ad blocking plug-ins?

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I suggest it as the backup browser. Use Firefox and if you need to open something that only works on chrome, I’d rather use chromium, so Google doesn’t rape your computer when trying to use the internet.

    • HidingCat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Nah, I use Edge for that. Chrome is only for work for me, but I think I’m going to migrate to another Chromium-based browser for that.

  • DreitonLullaby@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    The site you’ve linked to literally uses Facebook and Google browser trackers. Pretty hypocritical of them if you ask me.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Unfortunately, if the government had one single source to secretly control/monitor the world wide web from then they would gladly stand back and do nothing.

          Having said that, I truly hope I’m wrong. And they are probably already doing what I described upstream from the browser anyways.

      • river@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s really irritating but some websites only work on Chrome for me. They range from work related to Google Meet instances. I only use it then but yeah.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Have never had an issue with degoogled chromium not working on any sites that don’t work with Firefox.

    • DreitonLullaby@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t think I’ve used Google Chrome itself for over 3 years now (excluding on other people’s devices). I don’t plan to ever use it again either.

      • paddirn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        At one point I was switching back and forth, because I’d see a general decline in Firefox for some reason. I don’t know if it was just getting overloaded with extensions that were hitting its performance or if my machine itself was having problems or if Firefox’s performance was shit for awhile, but I’d switch from Firefox to Chrome, try going back to Firefox, then back to Chrome, but I’ve been with Firefox for a good few years now without issue. The browser “market” is even crowded now, there’s no reason to go back to Chrome, since there’s so many other choices out there (though avoiding Chromium might be a little bit trickier).

  • mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    We have firefox, iceweasel, fennec (android). Anything else not firefox based is chrome based. Don’t get tricked by opera and similars.

    You can still change browser.

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        63
        ·
        2 years ago

        There is an issue with monoculture of rendering engines. Developers assume every browser have the same things implemented and start to build around this assumption. Also Google can dictate how the web looks like.

            • DrDeadCrash@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 years ago

              You’re missing the point. Netscape implemented the html standard, they didn’t introduce new, proprietary “features” to gain that market share.

          • mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            That’s not the same.

            Microsoft was hostile to web standards and would not implement W3C recommendations in Internet Explorer, which meant most web devs would be wasting their time implementing those standards since almost all users were on IE back then.

            Chromium actually does follow standards, and has adoption through voluntary downloads rather than by being preinstalled on the monopoly OS.

            • DrDeadCrash@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              2 years ago

              There are two things to consider here:

              1. Adherence to Standards
              2. Creating artificial “feature” based defacto standards

              Chrome offers adherence to standards as one of their features. But it also introduces new features that look like standards, meant to increase profits for the parent company.

              • oyenyaaow@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Chrome offers adherence to standards as one of their features. But it also introduces new features that look like standards, meant to increase profits for the parent company.

                VB.Net was exactly that. Difference being Microsoft’s interest was locking companies and governments onto Microsoft’s enterprise products vs Google’s user tracking. Easy, quick internal web app put together in half a day? Would never work right on Netscape. It takes work to make them work to standards.

      • allalae@orcas.enjoying.yachts
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Using chromium based browsers keeps power over web standards and such in google’s hands, i.e enforces their ever growing monopoly. So if you want a competitive/fair environment on the web, it’s best to avoid them altogether and stick to firefox or safari.

      • Carlos Solís@communities.azkware.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Unless the developers of other browsers take specific steps, the ad engine will get pulled on the next update of their Chromium engine, that’s the problem.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Safari isn’t Chromium based! But I’m not a fan of it on Desktop, just iOS.

      Firefox for all my other devices.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    You guys are way to late to quit chrome, and you probably won’t at this point. This is what happens when you don’t swap, you enable this anti-consumer monopoly behavior.

    • Amends1782@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      2 years ago

      All the people saying to just use Firefox have zero fucking clue how screwed we are with google implenting the forced attestation for the removal of ad blockers too. Chrome will be the internet. Its already been initially deployed in chromium.

  • MossBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    2 years ago

    For people who roll their eyes when someone mentions Linux and all of the free and open source projects adjacent to it (including Firefox!), this is exactly why many people value those things. We actually can have freedom in computing and it’s worth pushing for. We don’t have to roll over simply accept what Google, Microsoft and Apple want.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      But there are a few specific hardware configurations and specialized jobs that Linux doesn’t work for, therefore nobody should use it!

      • systemglitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Why not be happy both OS options exist? Both have a place and a use and in various ways an ease of use

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Linux with 100% market share can’t monopolize the entire market because it doesn’t have a centralized distro

            You see similar to Google with Redhat/Canonical. If everyone was with them then it would be a problem

            • s_s@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Linux with 100% marketshare means nothing.

              GPL is designed to protect developer rights, not user rights.

              If google packaged your linux distro and sold it through the play store bundled with their own apps and sandboxed everything and called it chromeOS, your rights would not be any better protected.

              Security and privacy involves users making informed choices to protect themselves, full stop.

      • geolaw@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        My workplace is transitioning a bunch of their data and processing to the cloud. When I look at what software makes the cloud work, there is soooo much open source software there. Big business is quite comfortable with FOSS

    • blami@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Doing same thing right now… only two things I will miss are chromecast and page translation.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 years ago

        Good news about page translation, Firefox is adding it, and it’s all done locally too, no phoning home to their or somebody else’s translation servers.

        I wonder if there’s an extension for Chromecast support? Might be worth looking into

        • Sentau@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Good news about page translation, Firefox is adding it, and it’s all done locally too, no phoning home to their or somebody else’s translation servers.

          Till then there is this open source extension which provides the same functionality including local offline translation

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Actually there is one, but it’s not very good if I’m being honest ( but workable).

            I’m kind of surprised that no open source project of renown has ever decided to implement that on Firefox well.

      • Sentau@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        For translation you can use this. Since you can use Google translation service as the backend(?), it works as good as Google translate atleast in my experience

        • blami@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Thanks a lot, this extension looks very much as what I need. I wish Apple stopped their WebKit policy on iPhone so I could use it on mobile Firefox too…

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        only two things I will miss are chromecast and page translation.

        You can use your phone to start the chromecasting, and translate.google.com lets you also put in a weblink to translate a whole page at once.

    • jcit878@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      the main thing holding me back is the password manager in Chrome and having to basically use 2 browsers as passwords are slowly saved to a new system

      • avatar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Do yourself a favour and get Bitwarden or similar. Browser password managers are way too vulnerable.

    • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve only had issues with Nordpass crashing occasionally when auto-filling, but it’s otherwise pretty seamless

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The only issue is I have to keep a chromium browser because there are a few sites that Firefox has issues with. But the vast majority work fine.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Can you not use those sites? The reason they don’t work is because there userbase uses chrome.

        • lunaticneko@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          Unfortunately I’m not in the business of working for them. They are mostly govt sites in my country and we simply have to work with them sometimes. Their web devs are underpaid general workers who know a bit of Joomla but added this and that shit to the point that it works only on Chrome.

    • Rescuer6394@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      does this happen on Linux too?

      i have to keep chrome around for sites that breaks with ff / ublock, but i only open it when i need it.

      • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I have a chromium install lying around for that. Bizarrely the online conferencing tool my bank uses has issues with Firefox despite advertising Firefox support which is pretty much the only thing I need the Chromium browser for

        • rederick29@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Rather, use un-googled chromium. Brave is kind of bloated with all of the extra “features” they have.

          • YⓄ乙 @aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Where can I download it from ? Can you please share the link for windows? . Ungoogled chromium for android is not maintained anymore.

  • TheBlue22@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Time to uninstall chrome. Can I move my passwords, bookmarks and saved data there? How do I do it?

    • Mrduckrocks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      2 years ago

      When you install any browser (Firefox recommend) it ask you if you want to transfer browser data. It will guide you through (its pretty much automatic)

      • tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        just adding that granted FF already has a decent password manager there are also reliable, free and open source and audited independent password manager like as

        • Bitwarden (remote service as basic or premium plan, optionally self hosted, user friendly service, very likely has some account migration wizard tool to help importing data from browsers) and
        • KeepassXC (local, user managed, a bit techy)

        which both can plug in any browser through their respective extension.

        Being both an independent option from the browser they help the user not making him vendor locked to his browser through his saved data.

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Good to know! I’ve never installed bitwarden desktop and always used the Firefox extension. I just recently found out that Bitwarden has a desktop app. I was thinking of trying it out, until I read your comment. I think I’ll just stick with the extension. Thank you for your TED talk.

            • 6xpipe_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              There’s nothing special about it. It’s just the extension in a larger format. I’ve tried to use it a few times, but there’s no gain over the extension. And, typically the extension is better because I already have my browser open, so I don’t need to open a new app.

        • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          And if being techie doesn’t scare you, Bitwarden can be paired with Vaultwarden, which potentially gives you sync for free.

        • Aux@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          KeepassXC is not available for Android.

            • profilelost@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              There’s also KeePass2Android. I opted for this because it brings a very useful feature called QuickUnlock. Your opened database gets locked in standby but you can reopen it with just the last 3 characters without needing to retype the whole passphrase.

              @aux@lemmy.world

              • tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                KeepassDX can quick unlock with the device pin or with biometrics but the major hassle vs bitwarden is the management of syncing the database, which can be opened as file from the mobile and the desktop app also at the same time, instead bitwarden access your pwd database only remotely and only querying it, but the file is opened only on the server.

                But browsers plugin work in the same way, they connect to the local app like it was a server, so it might be possible in the future that there will be an app which can access the db remotely, with this being opened only from the app on the desktop.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      The only reason I use chrome is for the passwords feature and realising that it is a separate service to android password manager has made it pointless. I thought changing phones would be easier as it had my bank apps and everything in chrome but it never promoted.

      • Rescuer6394@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        to manage passwords, use bitwarden

        is not tied to any browser, it sync between devices and it’s free.

        there are clients for Android and desktop, most likely ios too.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Now that Firefox is getting in-page translation capability, Chrome does not offer any features I am missing anymore. As long as they don’t start performance wars, like the shit that happened with Youtube a while ago, I’ll be fine

    • ゴン太@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wait really? Is it on the stable version or do I need to install beta/nightly?

        • tiredofsametab@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          That’s fantastic if the quality is good. I only use chrome now for pages purely in Japanese that I need to deal with and can’t properly read in full yet (which, living in Japan, is a fair few, heh). EDIT: Bah, no Japanese support. Oh well; some day.

        • ゴン太@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Thanks, didn’t realize it’s an add-on. Much better because now I can use it on Librewolf. :D

            • ゴン太@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Offline translation, nice. I’m gonna miss Opera GX stylish theme but I’m ready to ditch Chromium-based browser again, at least on desktop :D

              Edit: I’be checked the add-on, unfortunately my mother language and other popular languages are not supported yet.

  • NewAgeOldPerson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 years ago

    Honestly, I was already using FF for my home. Made the switch on Mobile after seeing this on the news yesterday. I’m just one person though.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve also switched to FF on both desktop and mobile because of this. So there’s two of us!

    • googlrr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve been using Firefox Mobile for years. It’s never let me down and having mobile adblock is great

    • geolaw@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Apparently Firefox can synchronise your bookmarks between your desktop and your mobile app? Does anyone have experience with this?

      • Yttra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Works perfectly for me, though by default mobile bookmarks are in their own folder, iirc

      • sgtlighttree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Bookmarks is a little finicky in my experience, but tabs syncing between devices is quite good, but not as automatic as I want to be.

      • dekomote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not just that, it has a great password manager I’ve been using for years now. You can also sync tabs.