Democrats when they see an opportunity for an own-goal: 🥵🥺
“would” as in, “I would, if I could find one that isn’t insane”, or “would” as in “I have a plan and already know who I’m giving the position to and what position it is”?
I remember hee saying she didn’t have anyone specific in mind
Her answer was bad. She should’ve said “I’m going to choose the best people to make our vision of America a reality. I don’t care if you’re Democrat, Republican, Independent, Green—as long as you believe that we can make life better for all Americans and you’re onboard with our campaign, that’s what matters.”
But also, it’s a BS question to begin with. When is the last time they asked a Republican presidential candidate if they would bring Democrats into their cabinet? They don’t because they’re corporate media and they want to continue pushing the Overton window to the extreme right. The more right-wing the country becomes, the more monopolistic and consolidated their control of the market becomes. It’s fucked.
what the absolute fucking fuck is wrong with liberals that they can see and hear this shit and be like hmmm yes good
She’s going to put a Republican in charge of the Office of Blocking Abortion Reform and then people will just be like “uwu that’s just bipartisanship i guess”
Because most of the people that claim they don’t approve will vote for her anyways.
That isn’t a defense of these shit libs? Idk what the point is
Oh, I wasn’t defending them. Did I miss the premise of your initial comment?
Abraham Lincoln: Secretary of Ghosts
I accept your spookiest of terms.
Something something sit down with fascists, one more fascist now added to the table.
I want my president to have a diversity of fascist views
I vote for a Satanist. Would be weird to have an ethical religion represented in government
If she can find an actual Republican and not a Magat or Libturd then it’s probably not a bad idea.
Not at all surprising. Hell, Hillary Clinton beat Trump by 2.5 million votes in 2016 and she appointed him to the fucking presidency.
And now we will watch the momentum deflate like a cheap balloon. Liberals never cease to disappoint when it matters most. At least Tim Walz is cool.
Uhm actually, if you think about it it’s still harm reduction:
Think about how many Republicans Trump would appoint? Checkmate
I guess that’s unironically true but the US system with just one round of voting is a bit disappointing if you ask me. Makes it so that you’ll always have to go with one of two major candidates or the vote is basically wasted.
Ok, now they are clearly going too far with DEI hires/s
Vote blue to prevent the danger of Republicans in positions of high power!
Lmfao libs are gonna shill for them anyway aren’t they
Libs love nothing more than conceding to the right.
They love all the right wing talking points but the Republicans presentation is too blunt.
I don’t like this idea. But if it helps pull more votes from people who need permission to vote for her, I guess that’s what it takes. She needs to win bigly to really put the lie to the idea that it was stolen.
What if it pushes people to not vote?
