NightOwl@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoRussia calls Ukrainian drone attack on Kursk plant ‘act of nuclear terrorism’www.scmp.comexternal-linkmessage-square21linkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down11
arrow-up12arrow-down1external-linkRussia calls Ukrainian drone attack on Kursk plant ‘act of nuclear terrorism’www.scmp.comNightOwl@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square21linkfedilink
minus-squareHumanPenguin@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoParts of a drone 100m from the plant. In no way provides proof of an attack aimed to damage the plant. Unless you are trying to claim russia walked in without firing a weapon. Atm you do not have the info to make that comparison. Taking posesston requires survailance and potential removal of guarding forces. Drone can be used for both.
minus-squarefreagle@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoLOL, drones can be used for occupation? Really? Foolish mental acrobatics so you don’t have to deal with reality. Sending a drone, likely a kamikaze drone, at a nuclear power plant is not a valid military operation. What Russia did, quite clearly, was captured and secure a plant. What Ukraine did, based on the evidence, is chuck an explosive at a plant.
Parts of a drone 100m from the plant.
In no way provides proof of an attack aimed to damage the plant.
Unless you are trying to claim russia walked in without firing a weapon. Atm you do not have the info to make that comparison.
Taking posesston requires survailance and potential removal of guarding forces. Drone can be used for both.
LOL, drones can be used for occupation? Really? Foolish mental acrobatics so you don’t have to deal with reality.
Sending a drone, likely a kamikaze drone, at a nuclear power plant is not a valid military operation.
What Russia did, quite clearly, was captured and secure a plant. What Ukraine did, based on the evidence, is chuck an explosive at a plant.