• Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    In place of the Chromecast, the company will offer the newly announced $99.99 Google TV Streamer,

    They’re replacing it with a very similar product. Nothing to see here.

      • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        You mean twice the ram (1 gig more than the shield), 4 times the storage (32 gigs), and a better remote (chirping find my remote feature, programmable button, and less shitty volume buttons)?

        Yep. Sure sounds worse considering it also supports all the same features of the chromecast 4k and AV1 decoding.

        • LaggyKar@programming.dev
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          None of which changes the fact that it’s more expensive and clunkier, and none of which feels necessary.

        • moody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Most of the appeal of the Chromecast is that it’s a dongle you plug in once and never have to see again. It doesn’t need high performance and 32 gigs of RAM. It needs to play video. That’s its entire purpose. It’s controlled by any phone on your wifi, it doesn’t need a remote.

          For most users, this is an expensive downgrade.

          • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            The remote was the biggest upgrade for me on the Ultra though. I always struggled to find my phone and do stuff on it just to watch some YouTube or Netflix videos. And the Kids don’t even have a phone and they want to watch on the TV in the livingroom too sometimes. With the remote it’s easy for everyone to use it without fiddling with the Phone.

            My parents have the one without the remote and they basically never use it because my mom doesn’t have a mobile phone and my dad newer has it with him, it’s always not charged or in some other room.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s controlled by any phone on your wifi, it doesn’t need a remote.

            Or you can use it’s remote and not need to use your phone for absolutely every little thing.

          • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            The dongle still works. They reached market saturation with people who just want a dongle. They can’t realistically be expected to produce these forever.

            Edit

            Classic Lemmy. Point out that these are not charities and companies can’t keep producing niche products that you aren’t buying but maybe potentially want to buy someday and get thrown down votes. Sorry folks whether you like it or not it’s the truth. Companies like to sell things and if these were actually being bought enough to make a profit they wouldn’t be discontinued. Your TV probably has this feature built in now. Want another? Buy it second hand, the market is absolutely flooded with these second hand because they’re just collecting dust in cabinets. If Google kept making these they’d just end up as unsold stock in a landfill.

            Your existing chromecast dongle will continue to connect because Google needs chromecast the protocol to continue to work to compete with Apples Airplay. It’s the same reason the Chromecast Audio dongle continues to work 5 years after it’s end of life.

            If you want to make sure you have them forever buy up your local second hand stock but otherwise no one has given a convincing argument why these need to keep getting produced at the factory.

              • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Facebook market place in my small town has dozens of these for less than $20. Why don’t you pick up a few of these and recycle our current supply instead of asking companies to produce more e waste incase we someday want to buy it.

                • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  The large used market exists because Google has been producing them. When Google stops producing them, that supply will dry up.

            • variants@possumpat.io
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I mean I’d hope so because eventually this one I have won’t work like the previous one so I’d like a similar product when that happens not this 99 dollar box thing. I guess I hope someone else will continue making cheap dongles I think walmart has their own thing

              • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Facebook marketplace is absolutely loaded with these for less than $20. Let’s recycle the existing stock.

          • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yes! I hadn’t seen that highlighted anywhere in articles really, only saw it on the damn Google Store after looking just now.

            Seems an all around solid update on the previous device.

            • Dasnap@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              Just gotta stick FLauncher, SmartTube, Jellyfin, and Stremio on it and it seems solid.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              What do you mean regular Chromecast?

              Just regular Chromecast, not that Google TV stuff. That round dongle that does nothing but accept casting streams via that cast button in many Android apps.

              • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                So the one from 2013? Sure. It was fine for that. This is a different thing, as not every device, service, or whatever supports casting. I wish they did, but they don’t.

                Secondarily, I don’t want to use a screen to control a screen. I prefer a physical remote that I can have muscle memory for.

                But I get why people liked the device. I did too. But fortunately or unfortunately, it’s been 10 years and technology has moved. Which is probably why they are giving this a new name being an generally good upgrade on the last Chromecast 4K.

                Christ, this one even has a built in Ethernet port and doesn’t put strain on my HDMI port by just dangling there.

                • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  So the one from 2013? Sure. It was fine for that. This is a different thing, as not every device, service, or whatever supports casting. I wish they did, but they don’t.

                  Well, the story is about Google ending that line of products.

                • saltesc@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Yeah, I have a smart TV and would appreciate some faster processing in there. Or if I can flash a simplified ROM, but dunno if those exist. As long as I get control over what it does, I’d take it. Can just Velcro it on the back of the TV so it’s invisible.

        • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          They’re supposedly using pretty much the same chipset. So the most important part is still underpowered, these Android boxes generally work fine even with 2-3GBs of RAM.

            • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s supposed to use S905X3 with ARM Cortex-A55.

              There’s already plenty of devices on the market with this chip, and it’s fine, but in real world as a user you won’t really see any improvement over something like a nearly 10 year old Nvidia Shield that’s still using a more powerful chipset.

              Which is sad for a new device…

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Now with AI!

        I’m not sure why they didn’t just call it the chrome cast gen whatever though.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            I wonder how far away we are from AI being able to create video on demand like that?

            • MagicShel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              I think overall it’ll never be able to create quality entertainment.

              But Ow! My Balls! isn’t quality entertainment. I’m sure it can create all kinds of clips of things smashing into groins for ultra low-brow entertainment. Probably today.

    • Thann@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Similar product that costs 4 times as much and has AI features…

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        The low-power streaming box is dying. It’s not completely without reason, 4k playback is actually a bit demanding.

        We are in a place where the 2017 nVidia Shield is beginning to show its age and that leaves the AppleTV as the only powerful and capable consumer set top box on the market. This new option from Google will at least provide some competition and an option outside of Apple’s ecosystem.

        • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          I cannot believe NVIDIA has essentially abandoned its SHIELD micro console line. My Shield Pro has been an amazing sideloading fiend.

          • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I absolutely love mine, but I’d be lying if I said it didn’t stutter sometimes when asked to perform more demanding tasks. The chip is also going to start having issues with formats in the coming years. I’d love for nVidia to put out something that used a rival to the A15 in Apple’s box. Native AV1 decoding and just raw speed is really needed to catch up to use cases in 2024 compared to 7 years earlier.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      They’re replacing it with a very similar product. Nothing to see here.

      Like they do with messengers every couple of years.

  • _pete_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    I feel the original Chromecast was probably the last truly great original Google product, it was simple, it was inexpensive and it worked - you just plugged it in, joined your network and you were off, there really wasn’t anything like it at the time.

    I really hate what they’ve become.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      What’s funny is that was actually the start of them becoming who they are now. There’s a litany of evidence they stole the Chromecast technology

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Chromecast with Google TV made the “simple” casting worse for some apps like Netflix. Instead of it casting directly, it would spawn the Netflix app and make you use the remote to reselect the show you wanted to see.

        • jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Also they made it reliant on the Google Home app, which makes it really hard to change WiFi networks. It’s a pain in the ass if you have multiple WiFi networks setup at your house.

      • _pete_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I feels like they either badly copy (see Gemini) or don’t think about what they’re offering (see Stadia’s busted business model) they’re content to milk the existing services they’ve already got and make them worse by cramming in more ads (see YouTube, Google’s search result pages) and they cut out or dictate the web through their monopolies (see AMP and Chrome) rather than working with other parties to make good products.

        They feel like Hooli in Silicon Valley, basically the definition of a fat tech giant who doesn’t do any innovation of their own.

        • ealoe@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Badly copy (see Gemini)

          Tf are you smoking dude, Google has been working on AI long before ChatGPT was a twinkle in Sam Altman’s eye. They didn’t release any public models because they wanted to go about it safely and not just dump the world’s best misinformation creator on the open market for anyone to use with little safeguards. All that went out the window when ChatGPT got all the press and google decided they wanted a piece of the hype, but pretending they “didn’t do any innovation of their own” in regards to AI is ludicrous. They have been at the forefront of AI development for the last decade, and the fact you think otherwise shows your only knowledge about AI is from after ChatGPT headlines started coming out.

  • Gloria@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Yes I know the customer learned that product name and has a good connotation with it, but how about we change the name to something completely different?”

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Our current product offering is less than $50. We were thinking the next iteration should be $300”

  • thezeesystem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    Me - Ok Google, give me a open source way to turn my raspberry pi into a 4k streaming box.

    Google - Got it. Playing Tyler Swift on living room tv

    Me - wtf?

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    RIP to a real one.

    Back in the day when streaming was cheap as hell and made sense as all things were on Netflix, having a Home Mini with and a Chromecast was bliss.

    I used to have a shortcut for the phrase “I’m so tired”, it would start playing Star Trek TNG from Netflix on the Chromecast monitor and it just werked. Saved me from a bad trip once too, I was really uncomfortable on 135ug so in a desperate attempt to hold onto reality I said “alexa…uhmm…uh…hey google play RoboCop” and it just worked.

    Only thing is it played the wrong RoboCop (2014) but that only distracted me from spiraling further, like “hold up Samuel L Jackson was in this?”

    It feels weird to say but I was a genuinely happy customer. Then the home mini stopped working as well, started triggering by itself, didn’t hear words right, then the Chromecast had trouble updating firmware and rebooting. Then Netflix platformed that douchebag chapelle.

    Now all that’s left of it is the pihole I used to block ads for it.

  • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Literally all my friends know the name “Chromecast”, why would you rename it

  • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Really, rebranding from Chromecast to Google TV Streamer? Who the fuck was the genius that greenlighted this?

    • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I knew someone who worked at a really well loved local restaurant. One day a new manager came in and IMMEDIATELY wanted to change the name. According to him, you should change a restaurant’s name every 2 years

      Why would you ruin the recognition you already have? He was also planning on changing the name to be the exact same as a business down the street. I think he was an idiot

    • jdeath@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      they make 6.1 million dollars per day for their executive savvy

  • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Hmm, so, last month I began to have issues with my Chromecast for the first time. I have an old 3rd gen Chromecast attached to my bedroom television (not a smart tv) for the purpose of casting obnoxiously long video essays to fall asleep to. After like a decade of essentially hassle free operation, it suddenly stopped being able to maintain a connection to my phone. I cast a video, and after approximately 10 minutes, the cast disconnects and I get a message on my phone saying “this video cannot be played in the background”. I’ve tried ever troubleshooting technique I can think of.

    I know I shouldn’t attribute to malice what can be explained by other causes, but boy, seeing this news today sure makes me think about things like planned obsolescence.

    • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Planned obsolescence is built into googles processes.

      They’ve created an environment where your primary method of advancing in your career is only creating new things and there’s little to no options when choosing to support existing things. Some things have survived by chance and/or something to keep employees busy, but it’s unintentional.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    The Chromecast was one of the few things I really liked made by Google. I always have one in my travel bag and it’s basically like bringing your own home theater to the hotel with you. I had a time where I lived in hotels and AirBnB’s for almost a year and this thing was god send.

    They have some other device which they want to sell which will replace it, but that one is big and clunky, not meant for traveling: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSSI_Ht6Mis

      • jdeath@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        well, it’s just in their DNA. institutional inertia is a helluva drug!

    • BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I take my raspberry pi 400 with me ($70). I don’t like to travel with expensive things. Once connected to a hotel tv, i have a full pc. I watch movies in 720p to have more fps. In case I have something important to do but no TV, I vnc to my phone.

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Eh, not really. This product had a full run, will continue to work and the features are all still available in their newer products. Killed by Google usually implies they have a service that just ceases to exist.