That the person who reported it used a ML to try and find the setting to attempt to solve it, did not fill me with confidence.
They also never became specific about how well Gemini interpreted their tax result file. Did it give the proper number verbatim? That’s pretty damming. Did it just reply “You’re not getting a tax return”? That’s just 50/50 odds.
You’re right - this is a link aggregator that should point people to relevant news articles. Not a place that should bait-and-switch tactics to get clicks.
The reason for my doubt is that the person who reported it used a ML to try and find the setting to attempt to solve it - that did not fill me with confidence of their abilities to manage this. They later admitted that they did have gemini access to their files enabled in some form.
They also never became specific about how well Gemini interpreted their tax result file. Did it give the proper number verbatim? That’s pretty damming. Did it just reply “You’re not getting a tax return”? That’s just 50/50 odds.
I would much rather users on here not manipulate titles to make it sound worse than what the actual article is claiming. It’s intentionally misleading.
This isn’t a court of law, or the privatized forced mandatory arbitration that has mostly replaced it.
Out of curiosity, in your view, what has Google done to deserve the benefit of the doubt?
That the person who reported it used a ML to try and find the setting to attempt to solve it, did not fill me with confidence.
They also never became specific about how well Gemini interpreted their tax result file. Did it give the proper number verbatim? That’s pretty damming. Did it just reply “You’re not getting a tax return”? That’s just 50/50 odds.
You’re right - this is a link aggregator that should point people to relevant news articles. Not a place that should bait-and-switch tactics to get clicks.
The reason for my doubt is that the person who reported it used a ML to try and find the setting to attempt to solve it - that did not fill me with confidence of their abilities to manage this. They later admitted that they did have gemini access to their files enabled in some form.
They also never became specific about how well Gemini interpreted their tax result file. Did it give the proper number verbatim? That’s pretty damming. Did it just reply “You’re not getting a tax return”? That’s just 50/50 odds.
I would much rather users on here not manipulate titles to make it sound worse than what the actual article is claiming. It’s intentionally misleading.
deleted by creator
Every entity has the right of benefit of the doubt. Even if they are the worst entity known.