Wilshire@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoScarlett Johansson denied OpenAI the right to use her voice. They used it anyway.boingboing.netexternal-linkmessage-square39linkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down11
arrow-up18arrow-down1external-linkScarlett Johansson denied OpenAI the right to use her voice. They used it anyway.boingboing.netWilshire@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square39linkfedilink
minus-squareSuavevillain@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 years agoMost of AI just seems to be blatant theft and copyright issues.
minus-squarekibiz0r@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 years agoThat’s pretty much the whole point. Making use of other people’s work and likeness in a way that removes any obligations you would normally have to those people. Just clearly define “copyright violation” for them, and they’ll craft a method that technically eludes your definition.
minus-squareBlackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoNo, it’s only theft when it’s poor people doing it. When it’s rich people, it’s fair use of a publicly available resource.
Most of AI just seems to be blatant theft and copyright issues.
That’s pretty much the whole point.
Making use of other people’s work and likeness in a way that removes any obligations you would normally have to those people.
Just clearly define “copyright violation” for them, and they’ll craft a method that technically eludes your definition.
No, it’s only theft when it’s poor people doing it.
When it’s rich people, it’s fair use of a publicly available resource.