• BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 年前

    Hahahahaha

    Unintended consequences - what are they going to do once 90% of connections are encrypted, include use of VPNs and encrypted DNS?

    This is what they’re promoting.

    Host your own encrypted DNS on a VPS in a non-compliant location, use a VPN to connect to it.

    So many ways these idiots are cutting their own throats.

    Also, let’s list the companies rather than say “Movie Industry”. Or let that be a link to a Wiki article listing all the companies and their holdings.

    Fuck em all at this point. I go to maybe 2 movies a year, at most. And I’m cutting subscription services, down to 2 at this point.

    • khorovodoved@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 年前

      As a guy from Russia, I must admit that vpns are not a big problem for censors. They can be easily blocked, including self-hosted ones by protocol detection. And DNS would not do much with IP and clienthello-based blocks. And most users are not enough tech-savvy to constantly switch to new protocols as old ones get blocked.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 年前

        You have no rights in Russia.

        VPNs can’t be categorically banned in the US without major first amendment issues. It’s not a huge technical issue, but unless the courts just throw out the Constitution (a risk that we’re seeing too much of, but still a meaningful bar to cross), there are huge legal barriers to doing so.

        Your government doesn’t need to care about legal barriers because you have a dictator who can act unilaterally.

        • RedFox@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 年前

          We are just a little behind trying to elect our new dictator…

          But just for a day…

          /S 🙄

      • Syn_Attck@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 年前

        CBaaS

        Censorship Bypass as a Service, where your new updates are your [unique user ID].com

        Let us manage your bypass for you! Payable in crypto or cash.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 年前

    The parasites that keep the money aren’t the “movie industry”, the people who actually work to make the movies are.

    • dumbass@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 年前

      I have found and become a big fan of tv shows that I would have never had the chance to see because of piracy, one of my favourite shows ‘Corner Gas’ never once aired in my home country. Thank you piracy for helping me find good entertainment.

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    2 年前

    Legally guaranteed corporate profits, with enforcement funded by taxpayers.

    We should abolish this practice.

    • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      Yeah. This is socialism… if there’s one group that hates socialism. Meh. We know they support this.

  • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 年前

    I still don’t understand why they keep going after piracy when it is a symptom of the bigger problem. Movies today are expensive and often made inaccessible through BS digital services that periodically just make films and TV unavailable to save server space or avoid paying for licensing.

    I would guess that the vast majority of people are not pirating content. I’d also guess that if digital providers and studios would actually try to change the distribution model that allows customers to buy content that is later turned off on a whim, they would see meaningful change in piracy activity.

    • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 年前

      Because piracy is the boogieman that allows them to wrestle more power and profit from everyone around them like the parasites they are. They want a cut every time anyone ever watches something, ever. And they want to control if you even have the option of what to watch.

  • tux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 年前

    If it’s that big a deal go after the service providers for the servers, this type of shit just makes inhibiting free speech easier.

    If I don’t want people using Truth Social I guess making a bunch of accounts to share torrent links would be enough to shut it down?

    The MPAA still has never been able to demonstrate that privacy even has actual impacts on movie and ticket sales… When Netflix was super convenient and had a lot of content piracy went down. Turns out splitting to dozens of streaming services made it difficult enough that people just went back to sailing the high seas. So lower your prices, make it more convenient to pay for services and people will just do that instead.

    • ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 年前

      They tried going after the servers and owners and found it impossible to defeat all the piracy sites. There are too many sites scattered across too many jurisdictions and new ones are created too easily. Instead, they want ISPs to do the work for them. When the ISPs fail the MPAA can sue them and make more money.

      • tux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 年前

        Yeah, well they should keep it up. If they can prove in a US court that a “website is bad” they can make the same argument in the jurisdiction the website is hosted in, the Internet is great because it’s not (mostly) stuck under a single country’s thumb

    • TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 年前

      The MPAA still has never been able to demonstrate that privacy even has actual impacts on movie and ticket sales…

      It does. If everyone paid for tickets in cash and never online, they wouldn’t be able to harvest user data.

  • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 年前

    Half a year later, additional categories are added for CSAM. And another year later for illegal copies and cracks. All the while some states openly missuse it against porn and abortion. We know that game already!

    • hightrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 年前

      But did you even think of the children?

      Sounds like you just want to hurt those precious little ones.

      How dare you!!! /s

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 年前

    I would propose a law that states " All companies must keep their data away from the Internet. If the data ends up in the Internet then it’s up for grabs by anyone"