• Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In Sweden, it was mandatory for kindergartens to have “digital learning tools” up until a year ago. I wonder who came up with that brilliant idea.

      • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I mean is that it might not be so simple as not giving them access to it if other institutions persist in forcing it on them.

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just like the UK bill wanting an ID for porn sites. And, in the EU, Youtube is wanting my ID for age verification to follow EU law. Isn’t a much less authoritarian solution just to use blocklists, or even mandate sites send an unencrypted flag with content that is “adult” and browsers or routers can choose to deal with that or not.

    • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My kid was the last one in their school year to get a smartphone. He was bullied for not having a smartphone. He used to ask me for one several times a day and I stuck to what I’d said, he’ll get one on his birthday. I still feel it was far too early. He was 10 when he got it.

      • Dra@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You did the right thing. If it was the 1900s and everyone else was to give their child cigarettes, they might get bullied for having no cigarettes, but you know what is best and you stuck with it

        • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Also you are not getting bullied because you don’t have cigarettes or smartphones, but because you lack self confidence and because you are perceived as social weak (your friends and random bystanders would not come to your help).

          • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, you are getting bullied because humans beings are morons who will jump to bully whoever is perceived as different. Do not blame the victim, for fuck sake.

              • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well good fucking job evolution, you managed to screw over autistic people who have empathy while psychopaths who know how to fake it get to abuse everyone

                • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I mean, they wouldn’t even survive if we were still living under the survival of the fittest stuff, which our society doesn’t allow most of the time 🤔

          • Dra@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You have completely misunderstood this and are trying to overlay some bizarre Andrew Tate-esque psychobabble to explain your misunderstanding.

              • Dra@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You have drawn an incorrect conclusion about the specifics of the social mechanics and cited it as “from your experience” after presenting it as fact.

                You could simply have a poor grasp of social mechanics, or be misinformed, misunderstood the original premise but ultimately it doesn’t really matter.

                You implied lack of conformity and participation is not a cause of bullying - it absolutely is, its probably the original cause of most bullying.

                • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  A lot of words to say that you disagree, without actually explaining why bullies are not targeting kids who are at social disadvantage.

  • Melt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Single player games with retro graphic were enough to keep me entertained for hours when I was young. I can’t imagine how it’s like for the kids nowadays to have access to all the entertainment the internet provides.

    • son_named_bort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And the adults back then bitched and moaned about how we were rotting our brains doing this instead of playing outside or reading or other activities they approved of.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, I grew up in the 90s and while we had video games and PC games, we also did a LOT of non video game activities.

        Riding our bikes, sports, making shit in our parent’s garage, playing in a band, RISK board game nights, cinema, arcades, hanging out at the mall, rc cars.

        I mean, there was almost no time to spend playing video games.

        Today’s youth are missing a lot, and they are setting themselves up for a lifetime of mental health issues and the inability to be resilient through a lack of experiences.

        My kids, fortunately, had at least part of their youth without a phone. I can’t imagine what disaster awaits kids who only know phones.

  • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who is buying the phones? The parents. So the parents buy their children a phone and then surprised Pikachu?

      • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s still on the parents. My little lad is 15 and never had his own phone until his tweens. Amusingly, he was older than me when I got my first phone back in the 90s.

        He never got bullied for not having a phone.

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m disappointed that most people seem to treat kids as subhuman, not needing the basic right privacy and freedom that they want for adults so much.

  • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve put through kids through secondary and have two more to go. I universally regret giving them a smartphone at year 7. For the first one we fought valiantly - we said no; she and one other girl in her whole year didn’t have a smart phone. Within 6 months it became clear that she was missing out on a lot of events by not having a phone. We caved in and bought one of those neutered android phones meant for younger people - it sucked and basically didn’t work. After 9 months we got her a used iPhone.

    It was also the wrong thing to do. Social media immediately starts shaping them and we still have restrictions on which networks they can go on. She can pry Instagram out of my cold dead hands; that site is liquid poison for a young girl.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I never got a smartphone until 9th grade and it never really affected me that much. Then again, I was the oddball kid who pretty much never used social media outside of yt.

    But nowadays social media is so garbage and same goes for maybe 97% of yt, so I can see why parents don’t want their kids having a smartphone. Having pretty much instant access to services designed to keep you on their platform while also making you depressed over the life you could be living but aren’t is never a good idea, especially for impressionable teens trying to find their place in the world.

    • Misconduct@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      So then parents should just not get their kid a smartphone and stop trying to police everyone else’s kids. It really is that simple

      • mellowheat@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Perhaps we can imagine a society where nobody had thought of banning handguns for children. But you can just not buy your own kid a handgun if it’s so important to you.

        • DeadlineX@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I remember that story about those kids killing an entire school with their smartphone.

          That’s definitely not a flash equivalency at all.

          Remember when video games were making kids kill each other? Because when I was a kid, that’s what people were trying to ban instead of smartphones.