I worked on a codebase like that once. At least it was Base64 encoded.
I worked on a codebase like that once. At least it was Base64 encoded.
Security should be built in from the ground up. It’s not an afterthought. If you’re not doing that, you’re not doing it right. I get that there are time constraints but you should factor that in when giving your estimates.
Securing the application should be considered the bare minimum.
I don’t get it? Is it how the youth speak?
Yeah, when I grokked that simple fact pointers became easy.
Well it’s only divisible by itself and one
Technically, all comedy is staged unless you’re laughing at someone’s real life misfortune.
It’s boring to write
Don’t do releases on Friday!
The ones on your face, right now!
Penis Huge Penguin?
But the turtle moves.
Frankly, if your test suite isn’t catching 95% or more of the bugs, there’s a problem with the test suite and if uat aren’t catching 95% or more of the remainder, there’s a problem with uat
Tell me that you don’t have a test suite without telling you don’t have a test suite
Imagine using extra characters in your variable names. And they say Java is verbose…
I thought it highlighted the line number in blue when it was your code. I use eclipse so can’t properly remember
Does your IDE not highlight the lines written by you in a different colour? Of course that doesn’t help when it’s an error in production!
But what does an Arch using vegan who does cross fit talk about first?
To be fair, they share 98% of their DNA with humans.