Stumbled on this while researching tablet PCs and clicking on a Reddit “post” from Google results. I take no pride in any part of that sentence.

  • kalleboo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    People: Specifically add “site:reddit” to their searches to avoid slop and get real human responses

    Reddit: Replaces the real human responses with slop

    How can Spez be so clueless

  • itsathursday@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh were you looking for a diverse array of actual human experiences and opinions to then make your own judgements? Here let me pour a bunch of AI detritus all over your path to get that information, you are welcome.

  • lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is… silly. But I do wonder how it works. Does it aggregate all responses and look for commonalities? Does it factor in the upvote/downvote counts? And, does it know how to discern genuine user input from astroturfed marketing copy in disguise?

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      does it know how to discern genuine user input from astroturfed marketing copy in disguise?

      even with upvote counts, it might be upvoted for being a funny joke response

      there’s also no way to click on a user’s profile to check if the activity is genuine, or if the user is experienced in the topic they are commenting about

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And, does it know how to discern genuine user input from astroturfed marketing copy in disguise?

      That’s the beauty of it, it lends legitimacy to the astroturfing campaign. That’s a feature, not a bug, in the eyes of folks trying to maximally enshitify and push their shit products anyway.